Articles Comments

Pak Tea House » Uncategorized » Ahmedis and their votes

Ahmedis and their votes

As if widespread kidnappings and deteriorating law, order and sanitation were not enough, the Khadim-e-Aala-led Punjab government, on September 7, allowed yet again a large mass of ulema to gather in and terrorise the Ahmedi community in Rabwah — officially known as Chenab Nagar lest we recognise that those forced non-Muslims may also worship the same god. Surprisingly, and mercifully, the Punjab police managed to maintain law and order despite a rather unflattering reputation. Consider that, if you Google the terms ‘police’ and ‘clueless’ worldwide, the first 10 or so links are related to the Punjab police and its bloopers. Amazingly, the Ahmedis are not allowed to organise their own ijtimaas (gatherings) at any time during the year.

Another interesting fact about Rabwah is that, despite being heavily populated by the Ahmedi community, it has invariably been electing non-Ahmedi legislators for both provincial and federal legislatures since 1985 because the state has systematically disenfranchised them. This is because, from 1985 to 2001, elections were held on the basis of an unfair separate electorate system designed to marginalise minorities, which defeated the purpose of separate electorates in the first place. Ahmedis refused to be recognised separately from Muslims — a position based on their own opposition to the non-Muslim tag forced upon them. In 2002, General Musharraf restored the joint electorate system but the irony is, that while Shias, Sunnis, Christians, Hindus and Sikhs, etc, were put on one general list, a supplementary ‘non-Muslim’ list was prepared for the Ahmedis in particular. In other words, only the Ahmedis are, for purposes of voting, non-Muslims. This is absurd on so many levels, not the least of which is the fact that Jinnah, the founding father, had on several occasions refused to give in to the calls by right wing fanatics to expel the Ahmedis from the League. Even the classic consociationalist counterpoise that was the Two Nation Theory prescribed a test of nationality based on cultural and social distinctions between Hindus and Muslims such as names, cultural holidays, language, historical imagination and certainly not personal religious beliefs, which would have served to divide Muslims doctrinally. It was on this basis that the Muslim League laid claim to Qadian as a Muslim holy place both as a counterblast to Nankana Sahib and to argue that Gurdaspur should fall in Pakistan. Incidentally, Gurdaspur — that sob story we are all taught as kids — was Muslim majority only if you counted those Qadianis as Muslims.

However, from what I can gather from the Ahmedis now is that, while they consider the treatment meted out to them as unjust and immoral, they are willing to go about their lives if they are allowed to do so with dignity and the freedom to live their lives according to their own rights. The community as a whole is law abiding and constitutional in its approach. So, for example, when our courts decided that the Muslim Family Law Ordinance 1961 did not apply to them, they set up their own family arbitration councils. The state forbids them from calling their places of worship mosques and they oblige. So what then is the fear that our religious priestly class has in allowing them to vote like the rest of us? Their numbers, though significant, are not nearly enough to overturn the 1974 amendment.

The class component in this marginalisation cannot be ignored. As far as I know, Ahmedis, by and large, are part of the middle class. A great number of them are educated but socially conservative. They thus have the same concerns as any other member of the middle class in this country, i.e. the economy, corruption, opportunities and a better life. So who precisely would gain and who would lose if they were to vote in the elections? The mullahs can rest easy because Ahmedis just do not have the numbers to overturn the institutionalised discrimination against them. They do have the numbers however to upset the biradari and feudal politics in places like Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The idea of Ahmedis voting scares our entrenched status quo politicians who balk at any mention of the middle class, corruption, justice, etc.

Many Ahmedis I have spoken to admire Imran Khan as an honest and fair man. His stated agenda of a fair and just society based on justice appeals to them and many of them, if they were free to vote, would vote for him. Consider: according to the BBC, in the 2002 elections, the Ahmedis of voting age in Pakistan numbered between two and three million, when the total number of votes then was less than 30 million -you do the math. Ahmedis can afford to remain aloof from the electoral process but can Pakistan afford to keep them out?

The writer is a lawyer based in Lahore. He is also a regular contributor to the Indian law website http://mylaw.net and blogs on http//globallegalforum.blogspot.com and http://pakteahouse.net. He can be reached at yasser.hamdani@gmail.com

Written by

Filed under: Uncategorized · Tags: , , ,

20 Responses to "Ahmedis and their votes"

  1. Z Pakistan Mozilla Firefox Windows says:

    Sir,

    Just once correction according 1998 census total population of Pakistan was 13.25 Crore Ahmadis were 0.22 % that is not even 0.2 Million in total

    With Margin for error let make its 0.5 Million almost double still its not even close to 3 Million 6 time higher.

  2. Ahmad Pakistan Google Chrome Windows says:

    if i’m to vote, Imran khan is the last one who gets my support. i am an ahmadi and i see him how Immi has always been a pet of Jamat Islami and Taliban supporters.
    Ahmadis are deprived of their basic civil rights in pakistan and the political parties and the bloody self-righteous media don’t give a damn about it. can anyone here name ANY party who is against the amendments made against ahmadis or the ordinance XX? anyone? no. just coz none can loose the vote bank nor they afford annoyance of jamat islami and Immi’s pti.

  3. Kashif United States Google Chrome Windows says:

    Thanks for bringing this up Yasser. It is interesting that ONLY Ahmadi Muslims are considered non-Muslims as far as voting lists are concerned, with Hindus, Christians and all other Muslim sects in one list. I can only imagine the intensity and vigor of anti-Ahmadi sentiments and feelings in Pakistan and how it has been completely hijacked by the anti-Ahmadi Mullahs.

    I echo Ahmad. Any single politician who has ever spoken against Ordinance XX?

  4. [...] Ahmedis and their votes [...]

  5. Syed United States Mozilla Firefox Windows says:

    @YLH

    Thanks for writing on the Ahmadi situation. People like you mean so much for Pakistan’s survival.

  6. YLH Pakistan Internet Explorer Windows says:

    Z mian… Time Magazine reported in 1953 that the total population of Ahmadis was half a million. Do you think Ahmadis don’t reproduce?

  7. Kashif United States Google Chrome Windows says:

    LOL @ Yasser’s comment.

    Allow me to clarify/correct my previous comment. In Pakistan there are 3 lists of voters, prepared by the government.

    1) List of Muslim voters

    2) List of non-Muslim voters eg. Christians, Hindus, Parsis, Sikhs, etc

    3) List of Ahmadi voters

    Ahmadis have their own special place :P

  8. Syed United States Mozilla Firefox Windows says:

    @ Kashif

    “Allow me to clarify/correct my previous comment. In Pakistan there are 3 lists of voters, prepared by the government.

    1) List of Muslim voters

    2) List of non-Muslim voters eg. Christians, Hindus, Parsis, Sikhs, etc

    3) List of Ahmadi voters

    Ahmadis have their own special place”

    That’s true. I was just curious, which part of the national flag represents the Ahmadis? The list of Pakistani Muslim voters have their place in the “green” of the national flag. The list of Pakistani non-Muslim voters have their place in the “white” of the flag. Considering the fact that the Government of Pakistan has prepared a separate list of Pakistani Ahmadi voters, one wonders which part of the flag might be representing Pakistani Ahmadis. Just curious.

  9. Bade Miyan United States Mozilla Firefox Windows says:

    Syed,
    “separate list of Pakistani Ahmadi voters, one wonders which part of the flag might be representing Pakistani Ahmadis. Just curious.”

    Flag pole.

  10. Syed United States Mozilla Firefox Windows says:

    @ Bade Miyan

    Now that’s interesting. My question was: which “part of the flag” of Pakistan represents the Ahmadi citizens of Pakistan? You replied: “flagpole”. The flagpole, as you know is not “part of the flag”. Any other suggestions?

  11. Bade Miyan United States Mozilla Firefox Windows says:

    Syed,
    If you give it some thought, that’s quite an apt description of the status of Ahmedis, literally and metaphorically.

  12. Syed United States Mozilla Firefox Windows says:

    @ Bage Miyan

    Hmm. You are right. The Ahmadis are out of the flag and yet they hold the flag aloft.

  13. Bade Miyan United States Mozilla Firefox Windows says:

    Syed,
    And someone would also say that that flag(pole) is used to beat them up left and right..

  14. Z United States Mozilla Firefox Windows says:

    YLH

    Half a million where in Pakistan or world? remember many left Pakistan and ppl die as well
    and I just quoted the facts of Census of Pakistan. it say 0.22% and I say make it 0.50% still it is not 3 million

  15. Kashif United States Google Chrome Windows says:

    @ Z
    “I just quoted the facts of Census of Pakistan. it say 0.22% and I say make it 0.50% still it is not 3 million”

    Let’s say that even 0.22% is an exaggeration and that actually the Ahmadis make up only 0.002% of Pakistan’s population. Does that warrant the very special rights and privileges that are being graciously bestowed upon us since the past 27 years by the Government of Pakistan?

  16. MMZ Canada Safari iPhone says:

    @Z

    And u r still so much afraid of Ahmadies and trying to stop them from everything that they want to do.

    This is another illogical mind set? Not really, actions of Z types say it all but afraid to say and thus resort to lies let it be census board or so many other Zs.

  17. Hassan K Bajwa Pakistan Google Chrome Windows says:

    I must echo the question posed by other posters regarding the disproportionate fear and hatred towards the ahmadis VS their numbers and ability to influence national politics.

    That the state and our mullahists fear and “ahmadi takeover” is utter nonsense and gives great insight into the inherent insecurity of the loud, violent and intolerant mullahists.

    After all if they actually had any faith of their own they would not be so hysterical about the faith of others.

  18. I’ve been exploring for a bit for any high quality articles or blog posts

    on this kind of area . Exploring in Yahoo I at last stumbled upon
    this site. Reading this

    information So i am happy to convey that I’ve an incredibly good uncanny feeling I

    discovered just what I needed. I most certainly will make certain to do not forget this website and give it a look regularly.

    Feel free to visit my blog post – http://williamreubanks.com/

  19. Evan France Internet Explorer Windows says:

    Once I originally commented I clicked the -Notify me when new feedback are added-

    checkbox and now each time a remark is added I get four emails with the identical comment.

    Is there any means you’ll be able to remove me

    from that service? Thanks!

  20. Lauren France Mozilla Firefox Windows says:

    The root of your writing while sounding reasonable

    at first, did not really sit well with me after some time.
    Someplace within the paragraphs you managed to
    make me a believer but only for a very short while.
    I however have a problem with your jumps in logic and

    one might do well to help fill in all those gaps. In the event that you can accomplish that, I would surely end up

    being fascinated.

    My website – do-it-yourself solar (Lauren)

Leave a Reply

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>