Pak Tea House » Opinion, Reviews » Maya Khan should not be fired
Maya Khan should not be fired
Terminating Maya Khan is not the solution. In fact, it only problematizes the issue of media bullying by making an individual sound solely responsible for something perpetrated by the channel itself.
By Farwa Zahra:
A few weeks ago, there was a whole FHM controversy surrounding Veena Malik posing nude (read topless) for an Indian magazine. Despite the fact that it was her “personal” matter, there were arguments about morality, nationality, honour and the list goes on. Then came Maya Khan and Malik was nowhere. Television channels and newspapers started off with another round of morality debate but this time on the grounds of Khan invading people’s “private” lives by raiding public parks for couple on dates.
Both the stories revolved around morality and privacy. However, the way these issues were addressed was very different. Since Malik’s privacy had nothing to do with us, we embraced the opportunity to get judgmental, obsessively jeering at her. Ironically, many of these “self-righteous” people later came up bashing Maya Khan for intruding on people’s private lives. As if, by commenting on Veena Malik they were not invading her privacy.
As the issue of dating was more relatable for the genral audience, the reaction was proportionately humongous through videos, blogs and comics, which led to Khan’s open apology. However, the protests continued and Samma TV stepped up making a “heroic” announcement of Khan and her team members’ termination. And this seemed like a happy ending for many who commented how she deserved it.
I’m not siding with Khan as what she did was unethical. She played a role in media bullying and I’m glad people noticed it. But in all this rage and fury, what we missed was Samaa TV’s hypocrisy. Khan had been doing the show for a long time now. This wasn’t the first objectionable action on her part. The channel had even aired her slapping a guy on live show in past. It is incredible how conveniently Samaa TV now shifted the blame on Khan as if the channel had no role to play. Justifying the action, the “responsible corporate citizen” said Khan had not provided an unconditional apology. I’m only wondering how then the channel obtained the video of her apology, still doing rounds on YouTube and Facebook. And how would the channel justify terminating the whole team?
Kicking off Maya Khan is not the solution. In fact, it only problematizes the issue of media bullying by making an individual sound solely responsible for something perpetrated by the channel itself.
Filed under: Opinion, Reviews · Tags: channel, issue, Maya Khan, solution











said
said

If you see old paintings/sculptures from ancient India (e.g. the frescos and statues in Ajanta caves, 200 – 500 AD) then the women hardly wore any bras. With the coming of islam into India women became mostly sex-objects, orgasm-givers for angry-agitated muslim warriors and marauders.
—
The result, 1200 years later, was Pakistan. (Those who think Jinnah was the “wonderfully-blessed” allah-given-founder of this “heavenly” homeland for the “humanly superior” muslims, so that they can live according to their own “islamic genius” – they are badly mistaken).
So in Pakistan women will be always sex-objects and orgasm-givers for jihadist killers and machos.
—
When I look at faces in Pakistan then I see that the ruling elite has mostly light-complexion persian or turkish features and race consciousness. The ordinary people in Pakistan look dark-skinned broad-nosed indians (like any hindus) and toil in mud and sand and dirt and are misused as foot soldiers, police, servants, killers, laborers, sweepers etc. To deceive and SELF-DECEIVE about all this – that is the “genius” of islam.
—
If the women of Pakistan don’t develop the intelligence to realize the evilness in this arab religion then Pakistan will go further down the drain.
Media bullying or Media-gardi is a serious issue in Pakistan. There must be some code of conduct to hold media personnel liable for the authority they have by virtue of the power to reach masses and play with perceptions of millions.
[...] Maya Khan should not be fired [...]
Another example of such Media hypocrisy is the termination of the program ‘Chak-Gareebaan’ on Dawn News, just due to the reason of their campaign to raise questions about the ethical integrity of those who claim to be diagnosing the evils brewing in this society……Check on the Checkers!! should be a must-practice……
Interesting take on the issue! – regardless of the fact that I am one of those people who neither cared about Veena going nude, nor cares about Maya Khan invading people’s “Private Lives” in “Public Parks”. If you know what I mean … Maybe people should be okay with who they are and what they do.
Observe: It’s evident that you have strong anti-Islamic sentiments. You have a right to express since freedom of speech is what this space is all about. However, it would’ve been appreciated if you had provided any authentic backing to these statements. I’m particularly interested in the generalization fallacy you make by saying, “The ruling elite has mostly light-complexion persian or turkish features and race consciousness.” No one in right mind would take it as a rational argument but only a hate-rant.
to author
You picked out just part of one statement and commented upon it.
The whole statement was:
“When I look at faces in Pakistan then I see that the ruling elite has mostly light-complexion persian or turkish features and race consciousness. The ordinary people in Pakistan look dark-skinned broad-nosed indians (like any hindus) and toil in mud and sand and dirt and are misused as foot soldiers, police, servants, killers, laborers, sweepers etc. To deceive and SELF-DECEIVE about all this – that is the “genius” of islam.”
You wish to dismiss it as hate-rant – so it probably did hit the right nerve. Pakistan is about muslim deceit and self-deceit since the very idea came up (be it with M. A. Jinnah or with M. B. Kasim). If you care to look deeply then what I wrote will turn out to be no hate-rant.
I don’t have any anti-islamic sentiments – I have arguments based on history and present-day reality (since I read pakistani newspapers everyday).
Pretty interesting article. We, Muslims and Pakistanis are actually the superior beings, created by God to rule the inferior beings of God. We judge everyone and everything by our own perspective, even though the whole matter has nothing to do with us.
I do not want anyone to “publish” my personal life to public, neither I will go for making anyone’s personal life public. Malik and Khan, both did the mistakes and they are paying the price. Samaa did what every selfish person/organization does, to save their own skin.
Observ: I’m not dismissing anything, I cannot. I’m only saying arguments like these should be backed up with authentic sources. Hope you got my point.
@ observ
Did you ever look in the mirror?? No. Then have a look and tell us the difference between you and a swine!
You are wont to spew out venom against the Muslims and your comments are objectionable for being hate-rants and off topic. If you have nothing to say on topic you better go to the lavatory and wank in the name of your respected father and mother!
@ Farwa Zahra:
there is no question of so-called privacy in public parks or other public places. Maya did the right thing by exposing the growing lechery at public parks where students bunk and date, mediocre folks do obnoxious acts, indulging openly in unethical and licentious behavior which should not be tolerated in our society. Exposing evil acts which ought not be done and pointing out an obscene aspect of society by Maya was a great service rather than something to victimize her. Oay Sama walo!! ghairat khao aur Maya ko Zaaya na karo!!
@ observ
You see nothing, you are color blind, a troll of the highest degree!!
@ Observ
[[[[[[[If you see old paintings/sculptures from ancient India (e.g. the frescos and statues in Ajanta caves, 200 – 500 AD) then the women hardly wore any bras.[[[[[[
This proves how women were treated as chattels in ancient India….they are still treated as chattels and slaves by the Indoos..check out the status of women in Chota Nagpur, for one, where women still roam about topless!
There is nothing for you to be proud of nude statues in Ajanta caves… in fact, the mere drawing of them is shameful and an insult to women!
to author
what do you man by authentic sources? The ones which parrot the glorification of islam?
I read pakistani newspapers – are they not authentic? Not even in the least?
May be you yourself belong to the ruling elite of Pakistan with lighter skin and persian or turkish features and hence do not wish to let expose this bitter truth about islamic racism, slavery and ethnofascism.
Quote:
“If the women of Pakistan don’t develop the intelligence to realize the evilness in this arab religion then Pakistan will go further down the drain.”
It is better if you take this seriously.
@ author
don’t listen to this idiot called ‘observ’…he’s just a troll and ever ready to poke his nose in matters not concerning him. Reason is clear: he suffers from a serious complex in that he’s a kala bhajang dravari of the lowest jaati!
Observ: By authentic I only mean citing (or at least mentioning) the sources where you read this, because you’re making claims which can be questionable. Even a newspaper article is not authentic if it’s not based on legitimate sources. You, however, have not provided any source at all.
to author
I read pakistani newspapers everyday, since about 6 years (since the internet made it possible). These are newspapers made by muslims for muslims in a 97% muslim land with muslim laws, constitution, judiciary etc..
Therein I often see pictures from Pakistan (esp. in the Dawn). It is about street scenes, dargahs, landscapes, festivals, terror events, demos etc. Over a period of 6 years I noticed that the elite in pakistan is mostly light-skinned and has features more like iranians, turks, pashtuns etc. The toiling masses and the poor and the foot soldiers are mostly dark-skinned and can hardly be differentiated from any indian hindu to the east of the border. Some exceptions too I had noticed – but only a few. There are also regional variations. In the pashtun belt the fairer skins also belonged to the deprived.
I was not telling about any article, but about photos. I don’t think the photos had been tampered with or were in any way untrustworthy.
Is this not a legitimate and authentic source of info on Pakistan?
—
I had also written:
“If you see old paintings/sculptures from ancient India (e.g. the frescos and statues in Ajanta caves, 200 – 500 AD) then the women hardly wore any bras. With the coming of islam into India women became mostly sex-objects, orgasm-givers for angry-agitated muslim warriors and marauders.
—
The result, 1200 years later, was Pakistan. (Those who think Jinnah was the “wonderfully-blessed” allah-given-founder of this “heavenly” homeland for the “humanly superior” muslims, so that they can live according to their own “islamic genius” – they are badly mistaken).
So in Pakistan women will be always sex-objects and orgasm-givers for jihadist killers and machos.”
——–
It would be nice if you take the whole of what I wrote into consideration.
The jihadists go about through villages and tell people that they must marry their daughters first to those who are going on a jihadi death missions or gazwas. Mohammad himself used such tricks to “win” coverts to islam in the 7th century.
—
It is difficult for a muslim to be honest. He must glorify islam by all means and that is hardly possible without lying.
@@ observ
You seem to be a 101 % pervert rejoicing in sexy news in Pakistani newspapers rather than paying attention to the topic ! If you believed every word of newspapers you will soon end up
wanking in your toilet or jumping over the largest shiv lingham!!
Do you have nothing else to do but to badmouth Muslims??? You are definitely a brain drained banya of the lowest jaati! If Muslims are not honest then Hindus are worse.
With girls like Maya you have no chance for your vulgarity….as she is allout for cropping bad dicks!
Maya did apologize for her actions. It is time for channel to apologize and let the issue go. Maya and her team was doing real good shows. They have done many good things in their shows. Because of her shows many people have got justice in Pakistan’s corrupted system.We should not forget all her good deeds because of one mistake for which she have apologized also.
qadiani toilet article
why dont hindus make balls too with shivlingham?
@ Observ:
You are saying everything made up by your own dirty mind because none of the most neutral historians approves what ever shit you wrote in all your above comments.
The fescos of ancient india show the low moral values and no respect for the females so they made nude sex provocking statues and drawings. Khokhshashtra and Kama sutra were not written by muslims dear observ, please observe, learn, get educated first, then come to this forum.
As for maya khan’s issue, those people who she portrayed, disclosed were not muslim jihadis you routine egg.
to myth
Learn to get over your islamic indoctrination. Islam has become a kuran-centered and Mohammad-centered fascism. Most muslims can only use angry filthy obscene words as “arguments”.
this pseudonymous ‘observ’ seems to be overtly inebriated. The disCUSSion is about fairly ugly, droopping Maya Khan (Maya means Money) ,,, and this Spinning Dude drags in the Religion as well as the Holy Prophet. Very naughty.
Maya may or may not be fired, that is besides the point.
But I (with my legendary humility) do suggest that she needs a hard good Luckkk!!! I cant help her. I am too busy defending my Harvard degrees and my public interest Litigation blues.
i agree maya cant be blamed only…. samaa should take responsibility as the Chanel went very high in morning shows n when a mistake occurred only she is to be blamed… n she was true that she done such lot goods that she should be given a chance
Paris G
is maya arabic word? which of angeela rasool moh-mad’s baby-girl wife was Maya? In our native languages we have word called MohMaya but it has nothing to do with rangeela biti ch0d Moh-Mad.
which of Rangeela rasool moh-mad’s baby-girl wife was Maya?
Maya Khan-Female! Zeena Malik-Female!
Observer is correct! “If the women of Pakistan don’t develop the intelligence to realize the evilness in this arab religion then Pakistan will go further down the drain.”
Now, just imagine all of the females in Pakistan being offered Visas to leave Pakistan to go to any country they desire, and being guaranteed welcomed there, with a going away gift of ten thousand dollars U.S. and what do you think would happen?
Lady Guinevere
The proposal suggesting freebie visas and that too sweetened by $10000 each is INTER-ARRESTING. Those ladies accepting that know full well.. there is no free lynch.
The answer is a patented No. We rather retain and pamper our women (as a group the most beautiful on earth in spite of two salmalookii semi-imported, O-Level demi-memsahebs polluting (diminishing) the overall average down from a Perfect 10/10) in pakistan as our rulers and stronger sex, rather than be treated as sex objects and become doormats and footas in the United Estates of Amerika.
(I hope this does not restart the balls rolling with the Model Town H(ypocridsy)-Block Bitch bionically itching and breast-beating about my Harvard degrees! ((Dammit!! I have had my fill!)).
shivdildo worshipping indian rats are all over reza rumi……imo ballistic missiles are also an extension of shivlingham and they say indian army soldiers who operate indian ballistic missiles worship these giant solid fuel shivlinghams everyday.
faisal khan wrote:
Are you aware that Muhammad’s companions used to regularly drink Muhammad’s urine, and in fact Muhammad used to encourage that, saying that it was a “wall against Hell-fire”!

‘
Perhaps drinking more urine would help Pakistanis also escape Hellfire missiles as Muhammad promised!
‘
Anybody heard of the Egyptian Mufti Dr. Ali Gum’a, who wrote in his book “Religion and Life – Modern Everyday Fatwas” that the companions of the Prophet Muhammad would bless themselves by drinking his urine, and described an incident of urine-drinking from a hadith: “Umm Ayman drank the urine of the Prophet, and the prophet told her: ‘This stomach will not be dragged through the fire of Hell, because it contains something of our Lord the Messenger of Allah…’
‘
The hadith of Suhail bin Omar at Al-Hudaybiya says, that as soon as Muhammad spat anywhere, his companions would collect the spit and smear it over their faces!
Allah says
“Henceforth, it is mandatory for all new Muslim converts to read authentic translated Quran and Hadiths, before they can be called Muslims”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thk2ZrMRI4Q&feature=plcp&context=C3c0d883UDOEgsToPDskLs48IuJihd8XFgMzGD_XY5
http://youtu.be/e7tcPRvh1Mg
http://youtu.be/vZy1iKXIhy8
this is an indian sponsored forum…where hindu shivdick/shivlingham worshipping rats are all over
hindu slave rats will worship anything starting from monkey man to elephant man to shiv’s penis to pigs,cats,dogs,snakes,lizards and cockroaches….and then they troll on Pakistani forum…..
rat men from india having thousand years of slavery under their belt and shivlingham as their preceived saviour coupled with pig,snakes,dogs and cats.
thats why the world calls them slumdog bharatis.
Faisal Khan
Abnormal kids born in Gujrat Pakistan because of INCEST cousin marriage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WYMRaWnQvU
faisal khan wrote:
Obviously we find all that better than Muhammad and his Allah, otherwise we would have opted for Muhammad! But the Muslims had such a low IQ that they couldn’t prove that Muhammad was better!
Well rat men and Microcephaly is a Pakistani specialty! I’ve already seen 2 Pakistani rat men in my locality itself in Germany! They are born to Pakistanis because Pakistanis are genetic degenerates due to cousin marriages!
And despite all that power of intimidation you could not convince the Hindus to accept Muhammad! Well it either means Muslims are a impotent and pathetic people or their prophet just doesn’t impress, or perhaps both!

‘
Imagine a prophet who could not win in a race between himself and pigs,cats,dogs,snakes,lizards and cockroaches!
Q: Dear Guruji, in the Quran it is said, ‘You are god, you are one, you are eternal. You are not born nor have you given birth. Nobody and nothing is like you.’ This is confusing especially when it says, ’nobody and nothing is like you.’ Will you please say something about this?
Sri Sri Ravi Shankar: Well, this is perfect. This is exactly what is said in the Vedas as well.
In Sanskrit it is said, ‘Ekam’, you are one, you are eternal. You are not born, you have not given birth. When nothing is born nothing dies, you are eternal. These are the descriptions of the consciousness of the divinity. Divinity is only one, space is only one. It is never born and so it is eternal; it is peace, it is love, it is joy, it is bliss and that is what everybody is.
On one level it is said consciousness is not body. On another higher level it is said everything is consciousness even that which is born. And one step further it is said consciousness is never born nor has it created anything.
And on the other hand it is said consciousness is everything and when the body is made up of everything, everything is consciousness.
These are two different ways of describing consciousness: it is empty like space and full like the ocean. Quran has emphasized on one aspect, the emptiness aspect, the formless aspect. In the Vedas, they have taken the formless as well as the form also. The entire formless are also of the form only, every bubble that has arisen out of the water is also part of the water.
Sayedee at War Crimes Tribunal
81yrs old recalls wife’s rape in ’71
Staff Correspondent
An old, very ill prosecution witness, lying in bed and in tears, narrated before the International Crimes Tribunal how his wife was raped in the presence of Jamaat-e-Islami leader Delawar Hossain Sayedee in 1971.
He told the court how a girl was born following the rape, how his wife had to leave the country for good, how he had to live his life without seeing his wife ever again and how Sayedee converted him to Islam during the Liberation War.
“It was sometime between 4:00pm and 4:30pm. I was not home,” said the 81-year-old from his bed covered in a blanket.
“When I returned home, my wife told me she had been raped,” he said in an emotionally choked voice. She told him that she was feeling “intolerable pain” and she could not talk much. They got married only a few days before the war began.
“He who converted you to Islam came here. You don’t worry about me, just escape,” he quoted his wife as saying.
When prosecutors asked who had converted him to Islam, the witness said it was Jamaat-e-Islami leader Delawar Hossain Sayedee.
The three-member tribunal headed by Justice Nizamul Huq finished recording the deposition and cross-examination of the 23rd witness yesterday in a case against Sayedee regarding charges of crimes against humanity committed during the Liberation War of 1971.
Sayedee, nayeb-e-ameer of Jamaat-e-Islami, is among six Jamaat and two BNP leaders who are facing war crimes charges at the tribunal. He was present at the tribunal throughout yesterday’s proceedings.
The Daily Star is not divulging the name of the witness to protect the witness’s family from any social consequences they might have to endure.
The witness from Hoglabunia of Pirojpur had begun his deposition on Tuesday but the proceedings were adjourned as he fell sick while testifying.
Yesterday, after the witness resumed his testimony, prosecutor Rana Dasgupta had to go through the deposition slowly as the witness, too ill to sit up, went through the testimony and cross-examination attended by a ward boy and a doctor from the Police Hospital.
The tribunal had to take several short breaks during the 49-minute deposition so that the witness could regain his composure.
In his testimony, he said he along with one Krishna Saha and Dr Ganesh Saha was converted to Islam in a mosque. He was given a Muslim name and Krishna Saha was given the name Ali Akbar.
He said even converting to Islam did not save Krishna Saha. He was killed within days, he said.
“Delawar had told us: ‘You’ll live if you become Muslims; otherwise you’ll die’,” the witness said.
Once the Liberation War ended, the witness returned to his original religion while Dr Ganesh Saha, who also had to convert to Islam, fled to India.
The witness told the court that months after his wife was raped, she gave birth to a girl in the Bengali month of Agrahayan.
“People used to insult my wife,” he said.
The witness asked his brother-in-law for advice on what they could do. “He said, ‘Let me take her to India.’ And my wife went to India,” the witness said.
“I haven’t seen her since. I don’t know where she is. I did not remarry,” he told the court.
Earlier, the witness had said, “Danesh Mollah, Sekander Sikder, Moslem Maulana, Atahar Ali and Delawar” formed the peace committee in Parerhaat of Pirojpur during the Liberation War.
Besides the peace committee “they” also formed the razakar [collaborators'] force, he said.
“He used to introduce himself as Delawar Sikder,” said the witness. “I did not hear it before, but now I hear he calls himself Sayedee.”
Recalling the days of 1971, he said he and others used to hide whenever the collaborators went to their village.
One day, he recalled, nine people were abducted from his village Hoglabunia. They were never to be seen again.
Among them were Tarani Sikder, Banikanta Sikder, Nirmal Sikder, Haralal Malakar, Prakash Sikder and Nirmal Sikder.
After the deposition, defence counsels Mizanul Islam and Manjur Ahmed Ansari cross-examined the witness.
Responding to their questions, the witness said the collaborators came to his home only once during the war. And he used to spend most of his time in the house during the war after converting to Islam and until Krishna Saha was killed, after which he used to spend his days in hiding.
At one stage of the cross-examination, defence counsel Mizanul Islam asked the witness whether Danesh Mollah, Sekander Sikder along with Delawar Sikder (son of a Rasul Sikder) formed the peace committee and whether that Delawar Sikder, along with another collaborator named Razzaq, had been killed after the Liberation War.
While the witness’s answer was inaudible from this correspondent’s seat in court, prosecutor Rana Dasgupta, at a press briefing afterwards, said that the witness had said Delawar Hossain Sayedee, who was present in court, was the same Delawar Sikder who had converted him to Islam.
However, Sayedee’s defence lawyers, after the proceedings, told journalists that the witness had admitted that there was another Delawar Sikder in Pirojpur in 1971.
Counsel Mizanul Islam claimed that it proved that Jamaat-e-Islami leader Delawar Hossain Sayedee and the Delawar Sikder whom the witness had referred to in his deposition were different individuals.
The 24th prosecution witness is scheduled to give his deposition today at the tribunal.
Gilani on Islam
Quote:
there is no space for terrorism, militancy or extremism in Islam and those involved in such activities cannot even claim to be Muslims.
Quote:
Those, who spread disorder and chaos, cannot even claim to be Muslims as the scourges of terrorism and extremism are incompatible to the essence of Islamic teachings
Quote:
He said Islam does not allow anyone to spread violence and strife on the face of earth and forbids people to kill others
Quote:
The premier said since Islam preaches peace and love, therefore, those, who enter its fold, become the embodiment of the same
By this definition, India was never invaded by Islamic hordes making Pakis false Muslims.
How much deceit and violence and threats of violence have gone into making muslims – it is uncountable now. Muslims do not wish to be confronted with this bitter truth about islam. How much women have had to suffer because of islam and its tribalism, misogyny and machoism – that is also uncountable.
Muslims need to take to the path of honesty and then they can become couragous also. Otherwise islam will increase their sufferings and they will keep blaming the non-muslims for it and commit angry atrocities on the non-muslims.
PTH editors,
PTH needs an article on Syria…
First of all Sir Geoffrey, I never said they had to go to the U.S.! However, and this is a BIG HOWEVER, where the hell did you get the idea that we are treated like doormats??? Have you been smoking Feroz’s Hookah Pipe again?
In Pakistan a woman can get raped, even GANG RAPED, and it is her fault. A woman can walk around here in public in short shorts and a tank top and unless she is really an exceptional HOTTIE, she will not get a second glance. You know why? Because American women are also pretty and guess what? You don’t have to lift a veil to see it. And they shave their legs too! Now, I have seen some very pretty Pakistani women, as I have seen some pretty Indian, Italian, French, English, etc., women too, so unless you have left your country, you are either blind, need glasses or just plain prejudice! Women are beautiful all over the world but at least in non-SHARIA countries, they let you see them you Ninny!
The problem in countries where men and women do not grow up together, such as attend grade school on up “together”, it creates un-necessary mystery and disrespect and that is why you have so much trouble. Take away the BIG OLD MYSTERY and the interest and bullying goes away!
Lady Guinevere
Now again, as to Zeena! If someone wants to make a fortune, they should publish a calendar of her semi-nude and I guarantee you that those calendar’s will sell out 100,000 an hour! They would sell out faster than that but it is physically impossible! Then every man in the country will know Sarah and her 4 sisters daily and a lot less women will be raped!
LADY GUINEVERE!
indians will worship anything….ranging from shiv’s dick,rats,cats,dogs,pigs,wild boars,goats,cows,snakes,lizards,elephants and bats…….whats even more interesting is that hindus claim dildo originated from shivlingham…and they say that its a common household practice in india whereby hindus gift their daughters shivlinghams on wedding so that it came in handy……
according to my research this is the reason
condoms too big for indian men
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6161691.stm
that the reason why Pakistani kept them slave for 1000 years…
bharti slumdogs at their best under slavery.
faisal khan is a typical product of the islamic school system. Those who hope in islam should take note of this. The islamic education system will bring forth only such angry hateful irrational abusive violence-glorifying guys.
The real purpose and effect of 4 muslim/islamic rituals
1)
Muslims are ordered to kill animals in the name of their arabic god so as to tell non-muslims and ex-muslims what will be in store for non-muslims and ex-muslims when islam takes over. Muslim children thus learn early to >>shed blood in the name of god<< and this makes them eager and capable to shed blood of “infidels” later. (The definition of "infidel" is very flexible.)
2)
The ritual of circumcision is practised by muslims in order to tell women and non-muslims that muslim men are being prepared to let loose a sexual and demographic aggression on women and non-muslims. That is the real aim and effect of circumcision. This ritual also makes muslim men more ruthless, cruel, aggressive and exhibitionist in sexual matters.
3)
Muslims practise the loud "azan" (call to muslim “prayer”) which is actually a declaration of war against non-muslims. As the muslims increase in numbers this war declaration escalates into real war initiated by muslims. Every azan terrorizes the non-muslims.
4)
Muslim women wearing veils (of whatever size) in public are a declaration that islamic fascism, machoism and misogyny are marching on to victory and shall take over soon. The public veil vilifies women who do not wear veils, makes men more aggressive sexually and hides the sufferings/insulty on women under a textile cover.
—
The worst of islam is coming. It is marching upon us with shouts, shrieks, street gangs, blood sheds, veiled women and sexual, reproductory, demographic and territorial aggressions.
The real purpose and effect of 4 muslim/islamic rituals
1)
Muslims are ordered to kill animals in the name of their arabic god so as to tell non-muslims and ex-muslims what will be in store for non-muslims and ex-muslims when islam takes over. Muslim children thus learn early to >>shed blood in the name of god<< and this makes them eager and capable to shed blood of “infidels” later. (The definition of "infidel" is very flexible.)
2)
The ritual of circumcision is practised by muslims in order to tell women and non-muslims that muslim men are being prepared to let loose a sexual and demographic aggression on women and non-muslims. That is the real aim and effect of circumcision. This ritual also makes muslim men more ruthless, cruel, aggressive and exhibitionist in sexual matters.
3)
Muslims practise the loud "azan" (call to muslim “prayer”) which is actually a declaration of war against non-muslims. As the muslims increase in numbers this war declaration escalates into real war initiated by muslims. Every azan terrorizes the non-muslims.
4)
Muslim women wearing veils (of whatever size) in public are a declaration that islamic fascism, machoism and misogyny are marching on to victory and shall take over soon. The public veil vilifies women who do not wear veils, makes men more aggressive sexually and hides the sufferings/insulty on women under a textile cover.
—
The worst of islam is coming. It is marching upon us with shouts, shrieks, street gangs, blood sheds, veiled women and sexual, reproductory, demographic and territorial aggressions.
The worst of islam is coming. It is marching upon us with shouts, shrieks, street gangs, blood sheds, veiled women and sexual, reproductory, demographic and territorial aggressions.harami molvi gadhay kuttay gay k bcahay