Pak Tea House » Opinion, Religion » What do Hitler, OBL and Stalin have in common?
What do Hitler, OBL and Stalin have in common?
“God bless Mujahid bin Laden”
“God bless Sheikh Mujahid Osama bin Laden, and no consolation for the ignorant (Jahil) parrots of the West”
These were the comments I read under the following (liberal?) image I came across Facebook… so here is some food for thought (or not depending on how indignant people get in the comments).
The poster/picture was shared by a Jordanian friend and the commenters below were mostly Arab, (though I think Pakistani readers would have similar reactions). Now the general sentiment of the comments was agreement with the captioning of the personalities, all except for Osama bin Laden. What makes the goal of killing for religion (OBL), better than killing under Communism (Stalin)?
Here is another comment: ”First: Hitler was a disbeliever, originally did not believe in Christ, Second: Osama bin Laden, a man who acted when the world sat idle” (Hitler’s religious beliefs are actually not conclusively proven unreligious, however Nazism and neo-nazism today is heavily grounded in Christianity)”
What does this mean? Do people outraged at Osama’s presence on the above poster support suicide bombing? Do all these people not see killing as a crime whether it is Americans or Jews or Muslims?
Its not only us Pakistanis with masses of extreme wight-wingers, upset with liberalism, secularism, feminism and everything left of centre. Most of the religious world is rife with such destructive sentiments. The way a mass of us has been celebrating Mumtaz Qadri, the murderer of Salmaan Taseer, the same type of type of support groups popped up on Facebook for the neo-nazi Norwegian killer, Anders Behring Breivik, who killed 92 people in 2011. And it didn’t ened here. In an act of provocation the Thor Steinar clothing company, associated with the neo-Nazi scene, has opened a store in eastern Germany called Brevik, a name almost identical to Breivik. Neo-nazi parties and grops exist across Central and Westen Europe and are condemnable. There are many many examples of music groups, hate groups, individuals and churches that are know for being anti-Semite, pro-white and Christian. The difference is maybe in the quantity of support for these groups and national laws that does not give them space for great national and international impact.
So when people who share the viewpoint of the image, say that OBL is evil, or a murderer, or just an all round bad apple, its not because he was Muslim or that they are pro-West/USA, its because of his actions. Anyone who has such a disregard for human life is evil. That is why we have law, and criminal codes and prisons and punishment, so that a Mumtaz Qadri does not wake up one day and go on a rampage because he does not agree with what you are saying.
But is there a correlation between religion and ethics? Are religious people more moral than atheists or agnostics?
Studies have found no difference between religious and non-religious individuals on unethical behaviors such as dishonesty and cheating, while a negative relationship was found between use of illegal substances and individual religiousness*. Kidwell et al in 1987 found no relationship between religiosity and ethical judgments of managers. Religion may not be the key to making you a good (or a bad person), and there is no conclusive study to say otherwise.**
The picture also seems to show a (weak) correlation between mustaches and ethics. Get over it.
Notes
*See Hood, R. W., B. Spilka, B. Hunsberger and R. Gorsuch: 1996, The Psychology of Religion: An Empirical Approach (Guildford Press, New York). Also see Khavari, K. A. and T. M. Harmon: 1982, The Relationship between the Degree of Professed Religious Belief and Use of Drugs, International Journal of the Addictions 17, 847–857.
** See Parboteeah, Hoegl and Cullen: 2008, Ethics and Religion: An Empirical Test of a Multidimensional Model, Journal of Business Ethics (2008) 80:387–398.
Filed under: Opinion, Religion · Tags: Christian, correlation, ethics, Germany, Hitler, Islam, morals, Nazism, neo-nazi, OBL, Osama bin Laden
50 Responses to "What do Hitler, OBL and Stalin have in common?"
Leave a Reply
Recent Comments
- kaalchakra
said kamath, I second what you wrote about Nawaz Sharif... - Rex Minor
said Tajender,
Do you not know why the Poet Faiz mentio... - Kamath.
said The great Indian leader , Mahatma Gandhi once wrot... - Ronniejregd.Tblog.Com
said This is very interesting, You are a very skilled b... - Kharabath
said It was, on the other hand, a declaration of peace... - tajender
said EP U CAN UNDERSTAND THE THINGS,The Jews of Yemen w... - tajender said EP,
what is happening in pakistan ia happening all...
- kaalchakra
said EP, believe me Sir, the beauty and power of this... - Ex-Paki
said tajender
This is not a fight for fragmentation of... - Ex-Paki said Kaal,
From the point of view of believers, all of...
Excellent post. Most liberals are not anti-religion and pro-west. Please write a post about liberalism as a viable philosophy for Pakistan as opposed to conservatism. I am a liberal and I love my country. Ashamed that Pakistanis are associated with al Qaeda and provide excuses for scum like Qadri.
[...] Pak Tea House, August 2012. Share this:MoreLike this:LikeBe the first to like this. [...]
Obl was inspired by the sunnah.
strings of all these were in hands of zoinists.
Hitler, OBL and Stalin are all of them instruments of creator-god’s sadism and cynicism.
And one can also name the so-called final prophet among them. Even Jinnah, Mao, Idi Amin etc.
tajender’s intelligence is only enough to see them as “zionists or brahmins” (although none of them was so). This means tajender is also an instrument of creator god’s sadism and cynicism.
This tragedy and perversion will not come to an end.
and stalin was inspired by marx an lenin. Doesnt make them heros, or their philosophies flawless. and lets stop giving soooo much credit to the “zionists”.
i always felt that the most worrysome affection for foreign totalitarian dictators and mass murderers was coming not from right wing nuts but from ignorant liberals who were arguing along the lines of ‘sure there were things that were not good and need to be condemned, but you also need to see his positive aspects …’. i was always confronted with that by very educated liberals – as the extreme example of ignorance, see that now quite old daily times supplement: http://wp.me/p2qmww-dv
to jakob
Ignorant liberals? What is that? An ignorant person can’t be a liberal. If a person is ignorant then his statements are not to be attributed to any liberalism. They are to be attributed to his ignorance only. Liberals are the best informed persons – but they may not be perfect or complete in their knowledge. They may make statements out of their worry that the one who replaces a dictator may turnout to be worse and more vengeful. What point in replacing a tyrant who kills a 100 through a tyrant who kills 1000?
@jakob
so you think that Islam as political philosophy should be debunked as should communism because they dont work? I think alot of liberals would be on board with that. Dont broad brush liberals with your generalizations.
Additionally, what is termed liberal in Pakistan, is often not really liberal by the political definition of liberalism.
Islam is a personality cult built around Muhammad and it is a socio-political ideology.
.
Hindus get confused when they look upon it as a moral, metaphysical, cosmological and spiritual system!
.
It is not! Islam does make such a claim, but that is really a very thin layer of public relations, and not the truth!
.
Claim to Metaphysics (Allah) is simply to give this personality cult an escape route when it is under attack politically, and through such claims it pleads for respite, which it does get from gullible tolerant people. When it is not under sufficient pressure, Islam again shows its political fangs.
@ sameer, that has nothing to do at all with islam or communism, but simply an ill-informed affection for totalitarianism. yes, you are right, i guess when i used ‘liberal’ i meant ‘pakistani self-termed liberal’.
@ahem an ignorant liberal is one that calls himself open to argument but is making nothing of his possibilities to gain in knowledge but rather goes for the populist shortcut.
Islam is a personality cult built around Muhammad and it is a socio-political ideology
he deserve this.i did not for anybody better than him in human history.
Hindus get confused when they look upon it as a moral, metaphysical, cosmological and spiritual system!
what is hindu and who is hindu.usually anti-muslim abusers call themselves hindu.it is slavery system.
gang of thugs are called hindu.ashok killed entire population of kalinga before converting to buhdhism.
to jakob
You are heaping abuse on liberals by attributing to them failures which are not really theirs. The liberal possesses no street-gangs and propaganda space called prayer-halls (masjids). Nor can he be accused of any populism. His life is threatened in Pakistan and you accuse him of all kinds of ills. Rather you are practising populism by slandering him.
—
Islam is a fascism centred around kuran and Mohammad. Belief in finality, perfection and uncriticizability of kuran and Mohammad inevitably leads to this fascism from which here is no escape. That has been proved by the muslims themselves collectively. Muslims like tajender also prove this individually.
Muslims are the big abusers and thugs all over the world since 1400 years. They try to distract attention from their own ill deeds by calling others as abusers.
hinduism is mother of apartheism nazism and fascism.under hindu rule india was more poor than even today.chankyas arthshastra and manu dharam shastra are 2 gignatic octopuses eating very vitals of societies.AHEM i will awnser to later now i am busy in organizing beef parties in various parts of india.
to tajender
I encourage beef eating. I am myself vegetarian. But islam is the evil eating not only muslims but the whole world today. You have invented your own hinduism, which does not exist now. This proves that you are actually a crazy islamofascist man. May be that is because of eating meat containing mad-cow-disease. Islam will become more evil and violent day by day and your own contribution to that will be big. The worst of islam is yet to come and you will make it happen. Savarkar also encouraged beef eating.
savarkar was agnostic traitor.he was chitpavan jew.see his photo he looks twin brother of goebbles.he was a$$ l1cker and bootpoloisher of british empire.he taught indians how one cast can be piited against other and india can be drown in civil war.HE WAS BRITISH SPY,RESPONSIBLE FOR ARREST OF MANY SINCERE FREEDOM FIGHTERS.HE WAS HOMOSEXUAL ALSO LIKE GHANDHI&hegdewar.the following shows his bravery and patriotism,
What else can you expect of RSS? Deception is their game. Look at their credentials as a nationalist party. Veer Savarkar their icon as a freedom fighter wrote a clemency petition to the British govt:
“Now no man having the good of India and humanity at heart will blindly step on the thorny paths which in the excited and hopeless situation of India in 1906-1907 beguiled us from the path of peace and progress. Therefore if the government in their manifold beneficence and mercy release me, I for one cannot but be the staunchest advocate of constitutional progress and loyalty to the English Government, which is the foremost condition of that progress… . Moreover my conversion to the constitutional line would bring back all those misled young men in India and abroad who were once looking up to me as their guide. I am ready to serve the government in any capacity they like, for as my conversion is conscientious so I hope my future conduct would be. By keeping me in jail nothing can be got in comparison to what would be otherwise. The Mighty alone can afford to be merciful and therefore where else can the prodigal son return but to the parental doors of the government? Hoping your honour will kindly take into notion these points.” Mark the words “loyalty to the English government.”
This shows that Savarkar offerred to collaborate with the British. No Congress freedom fighter icon did. They never asked for clemency. Never offered to collaborate with the British.
Tajender, you are a moron
better to challenge if anything is wrong.
ahem the following is brhmn punishment to indian as per your holy scripture,
Brahmin punishment to shudras
Christening: Good and auspicious names should be given to the Brahmins only. Kshatriyas should be given names connoting braveness and valour. Vaisyas’s name should be based on articles.
Sudras alone should be given names meaning disgrace and degradation. Further the word “Dasan” should be the suffix for all the sudra names. (Chap.2, S.31 and 32).
A Brahmin’s “Poonul” (thread) should be made of cotton. Khatriyas Poonul should be made 3 of janappa threads. Vaisyas Poonul should be made of goat’s hair. (Chap. 2.S.44).
Pigs & sudras: Any eatable article becomes polluted and unfit for consumption when:
(1) A pig dashes against, (2) hens and **** fly over, (3) when a dog looks at, (4) when a sudra touches. (Chap.3.S.241).
Any one, who offers anything eatable to a sudra after the ceremony will go to hell. Such a fool will be punished there. He will have to live there upside down. (Chap.3.S.249).
If the Brahmins happen to eat anything that has been tasted or touched by a sudra, that Brahmin should have intercourse with his wife that night and the dead will live in the motion of the wife for a month (Chap.3.S.250).
There are seven varieties of sudras:
(1) He who retreats in a war. (2) A prisoner in a war. (3) One who serves a Brahmin out of devotion. (4) Son of a prostitute. (5) One who is purchased. (6) One who is adopted. (7) One who is a traditional worker. (Chap.8.S.415).
Duties of the sudra: A sudra worships a Brahmin either for salvation or for his livelihood. It will be a good thing for him if he calls all others inferior to Brahmins. (Chap.10.S.122).
As the Kshatriyas have failed to perform rituals and as they neglected to worship the Brahmins, they are becoming sudras (Chap.10.S.43).
In any congregation, the Brahmin alone should eat first. If there is balance of food, that alone should be given to others. New clothes should be worn by Brahmins only and when they become old and torn they should be given to others. A sudra is entitled to receive only these. (Chap.8.S.125)
It is the duty of the king to order the sudra to serve the Brahmins. If the sudra refuses he should be punished and forced. (Chap.10.S.235).
A Brahmin could extract work from the sudra paying or without paying. Brahma has created the sudra only to work for the Brahmins. (Chap.8.S.413).
It is the main duty of the sudra to serve the other communities without jealousy. For his service he may get wages. (Chap.1.S.91).
Exploitation: The wealth of the sudra who does not perform yagna is to be deemed as the property of the Asuras. So his wealth could be plundered.. (Chap.7.S.248).
The wealth of the sudra could be forcibly plundered. No consent is needed. There need not be any hesitation. (Chap.11.S.13).
Even if a sudra is in a position to earn, he should not earn anything more than what is needed to his family. If any sudra does so, he may go against the Brahmins and be tortured. (Chap.10.S.126).
Punishment to sudras: If a sudra talks ill of a Brahmin his tongue should be cut off. (Chap.8.S.270).
If a sudra pronounces the name of a Brahmin or talks of his caste or accuses him, an iron rod ten inches long should be heated red-hot and thrust into the mouth of the sudra. (Chap.8.S.271).
If the sudra dictates the Brahmin to do a particular thing, boiled oil should be poured into the mouth and ears of the sudra. (Chap.8.S.272).
If the sudra hits at Brahmin’s hair beard, legs, neck, penis, his hands must be cut off. (Chap.8.S.283).
If the sudra sits in a seat along with a Brahmin, his hips should be scorched or he should be driven away from the town. (Chap.8.s.281).
No, Beej, tajender may be a moron – like anyone else here, but he has explicitly stated that he would not bother writing what he writes if others did not disrespect Islam.
If Islam is criticized then tajender’s response is no different from that of, say, Kulhari, if you recall, when Kulhari’s religion was criticized. So singling out tajeder as a moron would be unfair and most likely misleading.
tajender,
your lamentations and curses are completely useless and beside the point. You still could not respond to what I wrote about Islam. Did I abuse it? No. That is the reality of Islam. What part didn’t you like?
to tajender and PTH
in tajender we have a clear “I-hate-all-except-muslims” psycho case. Since we do not know him personally nor his development nor those who islamically indoctrinated/molested him, we can do little to pacify him.
Often It was suggested that we should ignore him. It is true that he cannot be singled out as “the moron”. Islam produces the likes of him in millions.
Regarding Sawarkar and his implorations to the british – it was a strategy followed by him in a situation which was driving him to his death. His brother died under those very circumstances in a british prison. Neither Jinnah nor any other muslim leader (nor Gandhi nor Nehru) had to go through the prison conditions through which he was put by the british. He had recognized wisely that the british imperialists were less evil than the muslims. He thought of taking help of brtish to defeat the muslim designs on India. The hindus had no other power at that time. The language which he used in that letter was a clear fake. It was obviously a strategy by him to escape the prison. But he was a brahmin and hence brahmin-haters have always interpreted that against him. That brahmin-hater mentality cannot be changed.
BTW: even Shivaji (a non-brahmin) wrote glowing tributes and flatteries to Afzal Khan (a muslim) of Bijapur calling him “you are like my uncle” etc. Later Shivaji killed Afzal Khan (the muslim aggressor) in the mountains of western Maharastra. Sawarkar used similar strategy when incarcerated in the horrible Andaman prison. A brahmin-hater muslim like tajender has no desire or ability to understand that.
tajender is fuming against a hinduism which does not exist anymore. But as a muslim he has no other choice but to exist in the 7th century Arabia.
tajender is fuming against a hinduism
i am fuming against hate spewing human being like u.shivajee was a ruler u made him hindu.
tajender,
your fuming doesn’t hurt anybody! In the long run you will die sooner because of high blood pressure.
.
Try to integrate some positive aspects of life in your hate-filled outlook. Your hate doesn’t bother anybody, but it certainly shortens your life!
.
Try sex. It will help you loosen up and look at life more positively. Read the Kamasutras if you need guidance. Or watch some Jewish TV program like Seinfeld or Daily Show! It is light humor and you may enjoy it even, you know, just to relax! How about going to the beach?
.
I don’t know what your plan is with all the vitriol you spout? Do you want to go to Paradise and enjoy white blond 72 houris with 72 sheets of malmal on them? That is a bad bad plan! That is just the PR to trap hard-on dicks! There is nothing in them! Enjoy your life here and when you are done, do some vanaprastha and eat some berries!
to tajender
All houris in allah’s paradise now have AIDS (Aggressive Islam Detestment Syndrome). So better you take up RajTOO’s suggestion. Whenever a muslim man tries to near a houri the houris throw acid (not wine) on him.
Hindu means one who lives in the Sindhu river basin. Pakistanis are the real hindus, but islam has deceived and forced them to hate everything hindu. This is the worst perversion and misuse of human beings. Shivaji was not deceived by islam. Although he was well-meaning even towards muslims (=human beings misled and misused by islam) he never thought of islam as a good religion.
Jinnah did not have to suffer the kind of imprisonment which Sawarkar had to suffer. Sawarkar escaped the prison so that he could take help of the british to defeat the islamic imperialism. So his analysis of the situation was far more correct than that of Jinnah or Gandhi. Islam and its inherent fascism have proved to be far more brutish than british imperialism.
AHEM,savarkar was a bloody jew, his sole aim was to hurt india and indian.he was a$$ licker and boot polisher of british empire.same work his followers are doing now.rss is sleeping cell of international imperislism in india.your hate spewing and deceiving has no taker, as 87%of of bahujan samaj hate u foreigners.tilak wrote to britishers,pls dont disturb us as we are forigner not indian.
about 800 years u licked the a$$ of muslims for what.u are namak haram.brhmnst and zoinists are nobodys friend.
tajender,
what is a bloody jew?
tajender concocts his own history-narrative. He wants to be the Hitler of the muslims. His language and concept of history are very similar to that of Hitler and Mussolini.
I wonder what muslims think of muslims like tajender.
BTW: Why doesn’t tajender organize pork eating parties for muslims, esp. in Pakistan? Why must the hungry muslims be suffering the restriction of eating only cows or goats?
2012 at 7:59 pm
tajender,
what is a bloody jew?
rajtoo chitpavan came khazar,area of ashknazi jews.have same qualities,they are homosexual,agnostic,problem creator because of savarkar thought 5 million innocents died in partition.u have same blood line. in europe they were/are hiding among christians(father of sarkosy was jew from bulgaria)in turkey were hiding among muslims(young turks)in india same.they are secret instigators of most of the voilent acts all over world.now south asia and africa will be blessed with demoncracy.
U BRHMNS ARE LAZY COWARD CUNNING ALWAYS PREFER TO BE WITH ROBBERS INSTEAD OF THIEVES.AS U WILL GET MORE THERE.during moghul rule u were with them.before khatris were doing robbery on your behalf u ere with them.this alliance was broken.parushram finished these baddys.now alliance with bania is going well.wrote a fiction called geeta.u enter bania houses with this book enslave their wives.eat the best food.fk the best of their ladies a evil story of krishna fkng his neighbours wife is told to young and old ladies.the moment husband go to work guru jee become krishan jee and wife become radha.sometime husband catch them and beat them.2 days ago one sacred gurujee was murdered by a family.nityanand has warrant of arrest for the same reason.nearly 50-60 great sacred babas are serving long jail term for attempting rape.
with all these jokers roaming all over india u want beat china.
as per indian police report 2-300 thousands infants are stolen and sacrificed on deities.bapu asaram sacrifised 25 from his hostel.did anything happened to him.his ashram is running on land occupied illegally by force from poors.
u people wants to be with strong so u support america.tomorrow when i will,u will clean our boots.
tajender,
what is a bloody jew? Why is a jew bloody?
.
I know everytime you open your mouth, only vomit comes out, but try to control your urge and talk on the topic!
.
BTW how is your relaxation course going along? Not working yet?
RajToo
Tajender did respond quite directly. He described the qualities of Brahmins. He detailed how Brahmins are bloody. Brahmins and Jews are similar. That answers the question how Jews are bloody.
RajTOO
Jews are the people who will be identified and pointed out by the stones and trees to be killed by the Muhamad following Allah’s Muslamans. Need more hints of real peaceful, deep intellectual, merciful, moralistic and high elevated spiritual expressions from a medieval era product claiming the penultimate perfection? If you do need help then please search on the Punjabi words like Kussa,Shaadai and Kumla to get the sense of this dogmatic hatred for Jews known for their qualitative mental strength so missing among the best known product of medieval living .
Jews are the people who will be identified and pointed out by the stones and trees to be killed by the Muhamad following Allah’s Muslamans
i am talking of ashknazi jews.this has nothing to do with semitic jews of palestine.all over history semitic jews were helped by muslims.all over hisyory they had no conflict with muslims.last jew after leaving iraq told that iraq was eden of garden for jews.his lecture in israeli school is available on u tube.
BRHMNS AND ASHKNAZIS ARE BOTH VEGETARIAN.HITLER WAS VEGETARIAN.
the sense of this dogmatic hatred for Jews known for their qualitative mental strength so missing among the best known product of medieval living .
HISTORICALLY MUSLIMS HAD NO HATRED OR ILLWILL AGAINST JEWS.JEWS WERE HOLDING MOST OF THE IMPORTANT POSTS DURING MUSLIM SPAIN.WHEN CHURCH ORDERED THEM OUT AFTER DEFEAT OF MUSLIMS.MUSLIM TURKEY SHELTERED THEM.
FEELING AGAINST JEWS CAME WHEN EUROPEAN CONVERTED TO ISLAM.THEY BROUGHT THIS EVIL WITH THEM.MUSLIM HATES THE DEEDS NOT MAN.
Jews known for their qualitative mental strength so missing among the best known product of medieval living
THEY HAD NO LAND SO THEY HAVE TO STUDY MORE THAN OTHERS TO SURVIVE..NOW MUSLIMS AND HINDUS OF AMERICA ARE BEATING THEM IN ALL FIELD INCLUDING BUSSINES.
tajender has a jumble of words in his brain – words like chitpavan, jew, bloody, brahmin, khazar, ashkenazi etc. His brain fires out a volley of words chosen from these few.
tajender writes: “JEWS WERE HOLDING MOST OF THE IMPORTANT POSTS DURING MUSLIM SPAIN.”
So that was the reason why Spain of that time (800 to 1400 AD) was so progressive and tolerant – it was not at all due to muslims or islam.
(From now on tajender will take care not to write any such sentence again!).
Turks gave asylum to jews because the jews were so few and unarmed and brought with them money and talents. The turks did not let them in out of any love for jews but in order to exploit them.
So that was the reason why Spain of that time (800 to 1400 AD) was so progressive and tolerant – it was not at all due to muslims or islam
universities in muslim countries were built 500 years before oxford and cambridge.books to start to these universities were brought from muslim spain.arabic was language of science and technology.jews were holding good excutive post.like brhmns they are good slave bad master.u were good slave of muslins and then british anw americans.as master u looted entire india.
Turks gave asylum to jews because the jews were so few and unarmed and brought with them money and talents.
jahil church did not allow anything islam is not gang of cheaters and chamoleons like brrhmns.
to tajender
All the vices and evils that you ascribe to brahmins and jews, you will find all that and much worse among the agents and quislings of islam. You yourself are an example of this. If you are honest then you will agree.
All the vices and evils that you ascribe to brahmins and jews, you will find all that and much worse among the agents and quislings of islam
reverse is true.brhmns have swallowed entire india like python swallows deer or dog.in lucknow nrhm scam(medical) 10 lac crores is swindled by shuklas gupta mishra dwivedis pathak bajpais etc.
you are good slave and bad master.reason ,your weak moral values and hate for evrybody including bharat mata.
Ahem disgrace,
don’t you get tired of being thrashed again and again for your non-sense.
akb1
worships bharat mata. that is good sense. that is better than being the mental slave of some fascist arab god-concept.
akb 1 (or 2 or tajender or abdali) belongs to those who drink the blood of non-arabs and the poor, so he tries to distract attention from his own ill-deeds by accusing the brahmins or jews randomly.
to MA
Who says I get thrashed? You are the one who shrieks and whines and utters filthy words and then you say I am being thrashed. Is there a disconnect between your brain and your body?
All those who try to thrash me soon realize that their criticism applies to them themselves. Hardly that they point out some mistake in hindus or India a bigger crime takes place in the islamic paradise of Pakistan.
India is quite bad but becoming better. The islamic paradise of Pakistan is evil-fascistic and becoming worse day by day.
I object to slandering of Josef Stalin’s name in this.
to yasser
When muslims want to give names of evil-doers then they always give non-muslim names. Hitler, Stalin, Bush – even Gandhi, Patel, Nehru (when pakistanis name them) etc. As if there are no evil muslims whom they could have named to exemplify evilness. And we know that muslims have done worse crimes than the Hitler or Stalin.
And when muslims – even non-arab muslims – want to give examples of goodness then the come up with some arab names of the 7th century. Mohammad, Ali, Khadija, Fatima, Abu Bakr, Umar etc. Non-arab and non-muslim good human beings are unknown to them.
Muslims are a shame upon mankind, and a danger to a decent, peaceful, honest life.
Muslim children grow up with this narrow-minded hate-bias against non-muslims, and bootlick-tendency towards arabs. That the muslim population has crossed the 1.5 billion mark spells disaster for mankind.
tajender,
Now I know the truth about you. I think you’re a Jew yourself and through your rabid hate, you’re trying to position yourself and win the sympathies of Islamists! Very clever! But be careful! It’s a risky thing!
.
So how much is Mossad paying you?
to raj
A jew can never be as bad as tajender.
tajender is a typical muslim psycho-case.
It is good that he writes on the PTH. That tells us how islamic indoctrination and propaganda make human beings into crazy zombies.
But tajender is now busy organizing pork-parties for muslims. He will be also serving blood-salami to go with it. You can’t digest that tough stuff without a few pints of bitter beer. So that will come with it too.
ahem : you have become a “channel of hatred” to qoute Annie Besant’s phrase. it has now crossed the borderline. you are enjoying the SADISM of hurting other’s sentiments. Infact this has become your life-line, the purpose of your life itself. However, I sympathise with you. If you can afford it., please seek psychiatric help.
If you cannot afford it., even then you can/will get medical help. This is the Month of Ramazan., and muslims give alms. You deserve help and alms. With the Zakaat/Alms money, go see a god Doctor (psychiatrist).
GANDHI MORE DANGEROUS THAN OBL. Because Gandhi used hatred (mob violence / terrorism – in the garb of non-violence) to rise to political power and win elections. OBL was not as smart as Gandhi. He was never a super-president of a party, never won elections. Gandhi was 100% times more hateful than OBL., but at the same time 100% times savvy than OBL.
WHY so ? The secret is : Because Gandhi was a vegetarian !
to drona
The kuran is the channel of hatred and the source of arab imperialism and monotheistic totalitarianism. Arabic allah’s hatred, Mohammad’s hatred+arrogance, arabs’ hatred+racism is all to be found in the kuran. And that book you regard as holy! What perversity. Muslims suffer because of the lies and fascism in the kuran but they dare not be honest about it and hence must blame non-muslims. That is the short summary of islam. Muslims know this is true and get bitter-angry about it and go berserk with hatred. Right?
to Drona
Jinnah used more mob violence and terror than Gandhi.
Difference is:
Gandhi personally went out on the streets whereas Jinnah got it done by others and pretended he had nothing to do with it. jinnah was not disinclined to profit fromthe violence committed by muslims against hindus. Even in the agression into Kashmir by the pak army (Oct. 1947) Jinnah pretended not to have known it but did profit from the gains made by the aggressors. Those gains he did not let go.