• rana asif

    when cow reached to extinction budhdhist.

    when cow reached to extinction budhdhist banned lt.

  • Majumdar

    Tajender bro,
    never launched any project of public interest
    Err, didnt Lord R build a bridge from India to Lanka?

  • Mohan

    Your figure of Krishna’s wives is wrong.
    He had 16108 wives. Next time please give the correct figure.

  • rana asif

    Err, didnt Lord R build a bridge from India to Lanka?

    there is no proof.brhmn ex- solicitor general of india ,submitted HALAFNAMA in supreme court that RAMA WAS NEVER BORN IN INDIA.as per stories which is told to villagers ,that monkeys and squirells built that bridge.bullshit nothing more cock and bull story.there is structure in india ageing 5000 years.ram was 5000 years.
    this may from egypt whose king ramases(sees means,son of sun or chandra)built huge structures and went sudan or ethopia( land of blcks) through sea conquered them.in ramayana also rakhas is always black.

    it is all bullshit.fascists are preparing india to replace middle east,when money finish there.savarkar was atheist ,his followers are not interested in rama or krishna,they are interested in creating hatred between communities,which can be used at RIGHT TIME.DIVIDE CONQUERE AND RULE.

  • K Elast

    The United Minorities Challenge before the Modi Government
    The United Minorities are waging a no-holds-barred campaign against Narendra Modi or against whomever is or can be pictured as a pro-Hindu power-wielder. One of their lines of attack is the blackening of the ruling party, the BJP, in the eyes of public opinion and of the world. An impression is being created that the Hindu activists are out to oppress the minorities ruthlessly, and are already doing so to some extent.

    Thus, though the frequent rapes of Hindu women in Pakistan and Bangladesh are never worth a single line, I learned of the recent rape of a Catholic nun in the news programme of state television in distant Belgium. While a newspaper may contain hundreds of news items, the TV news has only a few, so they select what is truly important. Journalists normally use the “dead man per mile” rule: they treat an item as more newsworthy if it is closer to home or if the victimization is more dramatic. That means a “mere” rape in distant India only makes headlines if some circumstance makes the event extremely important. So, it seems that the anti-Hindu forces in India are strong enough to position their poster girl for “resistance against oppressive majoritarianism” as exceedingly important.

    The missionaries and secularists exploited the rape all they could to accuse the Hindus of terrorizing the minorities and demonize the Modi government across the world. Yet, from the beginning, the rape was known to be an extension of a burglary, suspicions of a “hate crime” were doubtful and nothing indicated the involvement of Hindu activism. When the investigation progressed and led to the arrest of some Bangladeshi illegal immigrants “belonging to a particular community”, most commentators fell silent. When pressed, they suddenly insisted that this was a common human crime with no connection to religion.

    It was but one example in a long line of false accusations levelled against Hindu nationalism, and this poisonous disinformation in turn is only one battlefield in a multi-pronged war. In the circumstances, it is imperative that the ruling BJP comes clean on where it stands vis-à-vis the minorities.

    First of all, it is necessary that it knows its own mind about this. The Hindu Nationalist policy towards the minorities should be crystal-clear, first of all among the Hindu Nationalists themselves. Once they know what to think, they can decide what to say towards Indian opinion at large, and what to do.

  • K Elast

    The secularist alliance

    The iron fist of the attack (the Zarb-e-Mo’min, “strike of the faithful”, as the Pakistani Army once named one of its exercises) is furnished by Christianity and Islam, who mean to expand worldwide and in the process destroy all heathen religions. They have a positive goal, viz. perpetuating and propagating themselves, and their negative goal of digesting or annihilating Hinduism only follows therefrom. This way, they have a very good conscience in doing their work of destruction: it is only meant to clear the way for the true religion.

    So, they have inner strength, but they also have outer strength: they are huge and very wealthy, being only the Indian arms of two worldwide movements. It is ridiculous that they are called “minorities” at all, yet they carefully cultivate that status, for in the present-day mentality, any majority is deemed overbearing and oppressive. Their foreign roots not only make them very resourceful, they also give them a head-start in developing a coherent strategy with sustainable long-term goals.

    But this iron fist is clothed in a velvet glove: secularism. Knaves claim and fools believe that this is the Indian instance of the worldwide phenomenon of secularism (separation of religion and politics) originating in the West, but it is not. Thus, Islamic militants who in Arabia would abhor secularism (meaning separation of religion and politics, e.g. democratic law-making separate from what Islam prescribes), emphatically call themselves “secularists” in India. The reason is that in India, the word has a very different meaning: anything that is anti-Hindu. Islamic militants are anti-Hindu, so they indeed qualify as “secularists”. But what animates them is not this profile of secularism but their heartfelt commitment to Islam; and similarly with Christian missionaries, who can rightly call themselves secularists under the Indian definition, though their real commitment is to Christianity. So when we say “secularists”, we don’t usually mean them, we mean the Hindu-born secularists, who genuinely intend to define their uppermost commitment when they call themselves secularists.

    At one time the Marxists formed the backbone of Indian secularism, and even now that Marxism is waning, a Marxist afterglow continues to condition the secularist conceptual framework. However, at present the forces of commercialization and consumerism are in the ascendant. The easiness of this transmogrification from Marxist to consumerist follows from the real definition of secularism: both Marxism and consumerism are anti-Hindu and can wean Hindus away from their Dharma, and that is what counts.

    Finally, the anti-Hindu coalition can avail of the services of several useful idiots, Hindu-born but turned against Hinduism. These include the Ambedkarite section of the Scheduled Castes; a minor section of the Scheduled Tribes that has come to parrot the missionary claim that “tribals are not Hindus”; the Dravidianist movement, at one time genuinely anti-religion but now only anti-Hindu; and some “progressive” and “enlightened” sections of religious Hinduism that prefer to distance themselves from Hinduism, either out of self-interest (to escape the legal discriminations against Hinduism) or out of snobbery.

  • K Elast

    Caving in to aggressive minorityism

    The reaction of the BJP and the Hindutva forces behind it is just that: a reaction. Even what little ideology they once had, viz. a general commitment to Hinduism, has made way for a mere craving of approval from the hegemonic opinion-makers, the secularists. You would think that finally the BJP is securely in power, but this is only formally the case. Ideologically, the BJP still looks up to the secularists as the real power-wielders. It does not analyse the discourse of the secularists from a vantage-point of its own, from an alternative pro-Hindu worldview; it merely reacts to what it perceives as an unassailable and omnipresent secularist opinion.

    Thus, when the secularists clamoured against Ghar Wapasi, BJP Ministers hurried to assure everyone that they too were very much against its “divisive” effects. Ghar Wapasi is the best chance Hindus (when thinking farther than the next election, especially about their survival) have to prevent the hostile takeover of their country. For a supposedly “Hindu nationalist” party, that is not a bargaining chip but a fundamental concern. There is also no reason at all to get caught on the back foot over it, certainly not in a country where conversion is legal and has always been defended by the secularists.

    When the missionaries started disinforming world opinion that churches were systematically targeted by Hindu militants for vandalism and robberies, the Government assured that it would crack down on these “church attacks”, instead of questioning the whole notion of communally-motivated church attacks. These were only ordinary, non-ideological crimes, far surpassed in number by the vandalism against and robberies in Hindu temples. The BJP always swallows and then reproduces the presuppositions spoon-fed to it by its enemies.

    Yet a silver lining can be discerned. The BJP’s palpable concern of “keeping the pot boiling”, of keeping its Hindu vote-bank happy with empty gestures of Hindu feeling, may translate into a real concern for Hindu interests. At present, it is mostly a cynical electoral policy of the BJP secularists, a generation of politicians who have “emancipated” themselves from the pro-Hindu inspiration that spawned their party. They remember how the party was defeated in 2004, when in spite of huge economic successes under Atal Behari Vajpayee, it had completely alienated its Hindu-minded voters by not showing any concern at all for the Hindu agenda. They realize they are totally dependent on Hindu-minded party workers and campaign volunteers for the power positions they enjoy.

    So, this time around they intend to keep these Hindus actively involved with some much-publicized gestures, such as televised temple visits in India and abroad, or award ceremonies for Vajpayee, LK Advani, Vamadeva Shastri and Swapan Dasgupta. A masterstroke is their support to State laws against cow-slaughter: many ordinary Hindus not attuned to the precise legal discrimination against Hinduism, but full of feeling for Mother Cow, will certainly appreciate this. That it is not an empty measure is demonstrated by the rise in beef prices in Bangladesh.

    Even the nasty anti-minority statements by some loose cannon in the BJP, though deplored out of either tactical calculation or genuine pro-secularist sentiment, are nonetheless chalked up as pleasing a hot-blooded section of the Hindu electorate. A section of Hindu society without too much discernment is already happy with any utterance that sounds pro-Hindu. The only way to rally that section around a more positive pro-Hindu programme is to offer such a programme in the first place.

    This is all not very deep nor very meaningful, but it might remind ruling party politicians of their Hindu roots. Maybe they suffer from Hanuman’s curse: when the gods became afraid of him witnessing his strength, they cursed him to forget his strength until someone reminded him. Indeed, they need a reminder of the immense strength resulting from a commitment to Dharma. Instead of whining about the hurdles the secularists may put in their way and using these as an excuse to remain on the safe ground of “development”, they ought to remember the slogan they themselves used to intone: Dharmo Rakshati Rakshitah, “Righteousness, when protected, protects”. It is time to stand up for Dharma, and all will be well. If a party served by Hindu workers doesn’t serve Hinduism, it serves no purpose at all.

  • K Elast

    Dealing with aggressive minorityism

    When we read the laws privileging the minorities, one thing that strikes us is the complete Hindu passivity in using these laws to their advantage. To be sure, those laws are unsecular as well as indefensible, but while they exist, Hindus could make the best of it. Thus, in several states and in many districts, Hindus as such are a minority. Moreover, the law also recognizes linguistic minorities, so Gujaratis in Tamil Nadu (etc.) could also demand minority privileges. As in other aspects of this problem, Hindus take it lying down.

    There is also the dishonourable option of leaving the Hindu fold to fend for itself, and declaring oneself a non-Hindu minority. This is the usual Hindu disease of safeguarding one’s own little community at the expense of the whole. Rather than going around and telling these “ex”-Hindus just how contemptible their behaviour is, it is better and more effective to remove the temptation by restoring equality for the Hindus.

    Even before amending the offending Articles, Hindu thinkers could question the very concept of “minority”. India consists only of minorities. Hinduism is a commonwealth of many communities, each a minority. One has to be very gullible (or so absorbed by “development”, as the present BJP team claims to be) to swallow this notion of “minority” with all the privileges that go with it.

    Once they have fully understood the implicit definition and ramifications of “minority”, serious Hindu (and just secular) thinkers behind and ministers inside the government should proceed to scrap it from the laws and the Constitution. Or at least, unless those whiz kids discover anything unexpected, that would seem to be the logical conclusion. Down with the whole concept of minorities, starting with the Minorities Commission, an intrinsically anti-majority lobby-group with a legal status.

    At the same time, though, one should be careful here: pampered and privileged communities might see the instauration of equality as a great injustice. For the time being, they are far better than the Hindus at selling their own view to the Indian public and to the world. So, they will shout that the minorities are being oppressed, that an overbearing Hindu majority is taking “rights” away from them, and all the other well-known whining and wailing. It is important to present the issue in terms of secularism and democracy, which constitute sufficient ground for equality, not in selfish terms of Hindu interests. Even then the other side can be expected to misrepresent the issue, so Hindus will need to be innocent as children and wise as snakes.

  • K Elast

    Satya about minority teachings

    Towards the minorities, a policy is needed that could properly be called Gandhian. It does not mean being naïve and inconsistent, as students of the Partition might think. No, it means seriously applying the principles that Mahatma Gandhi talked about and remains associated with, though he himself failed to apply them. These are: satya/truth and ahimsa/non-violence.

    Satya requires facing the truth concerning Christianity and Islam. This may require a mental leap for Hindus, who are not used to asking about the truth of a religion. When a Christian community was given asylum in Kerala, their Hindu hosts did not ask for the contents of their doctrine, let alone its degree of truth. Few people know the truth, and not many are even interested in it. Hindus were already satisfied if these newcomers lived in peace and respected certain basic norms such as not killing cows or Brahmins. It is not natural for Hindus to scrutinize religious doctrines.

    In general, this is as it should be. However, this wilful ignorance should not arrogate to itself the pretence to somehow know these religions nonetheless. Gandhi, who was not a student of religious doctrines, claimed that all religions automatically deserve equal respect. While leaving undecided for now what he himself meant by it, the secularist sermonizers who venture to interpret his teachings for us, claim that it means the “equal truth of all religions”, and that “all religions lead to the same goal”. This, however, is blatantly untrue. One may refrain from judging the truth of a religion, but one should not speak untruth about religion, much less think it.

    Anyone who is grown up and has the power of discrimination will have experienced that truth claims may be true or may be false, and that “1 + 1 = 2” is not equally true with “1 + 1 = 4”, nor do the two truth claims deserve equal respect. Someone who makes a false claim may deserve equal respect with someone who affirms a true statement (both equally deserve better than to be stoned or crucified), but it doesn’t follow that their statements deserve equal respect. Case in point: the core doctrines of Christianity are not true and deserve to be treated as mistakes. Extremely globalized mistakes by now, but still mistakes.

    Oh, maybe some wily secularist or sentimental Hindu will now object that to say so or even to think critically of a belief held so dear by millions is a hate crime. Such a thing could only be opined by knaves and swallowed by fools. I have never heard a Hindu whine and wail because he himself was being considered as an errant soul, living a mistake, condemned to eternal hellfire, utterly doomed – yet that is what Christianity and Islam say and what billions of believers hold against him. Moreover, it is also what Christians think of Muslims and Muslims of Christians. It is no big deal if Hindus remain aloof from the superstitions at the core of Christian or Islamic doctrine.

    Another objection, likely to be raised by politicians, is that it would be undiplomatic to say less than flattering things about Christianity or Islam. Many people never face the question of truth; when it distantly threatens to arise, they immediately disperse it or distract from it with the question in what company it might put them. That, for them, is far more important than an ivory-tower concern like the truth. Alright, thinking something is one thing, saying it is another. Holding an informed opinion is separate from voicing that opinion and facing the social consequences. I am well aware that politicians have to keep in mind power equations among the people and therefore have to adapt their utterances to what is socially feasible. Indeed, it is the genius of Hindu Dharma that it recognizes the differentiated duties of different groups. Intellectuals who settle for less than the truth are not living up to their duty, but politicians might have other interests to take into account.

  • Majumdar

    Tajender bro,
    brhmn ex- solicitor general of india ,submitted HALAFNAMA in supreme court that RAMA WAS NEVER BORN IN INDIA.
    But bammans are into speaking lies, zhoot is their dharma, no? It means the SG was lying, which means Lord R was born in India!

  • Mohan


    The Welfare State makes us all poorer in character and independence. Confiscation of freedom through abridgements of individuals’ rights to their life, liberty and honestly acquired property, also brings with it a less humane and civil society.

    With liberty comes not only the individual’s right to make his own choices concerning how best to live his life. The experience of the Great Britain and the United States before the modern Welfare State makes it clear that free man are also civilized human beings who demonstrate appropriate and reasonable interest and concern with others in society deemed deserving of charitable benevolence.

  • Mohan

    ‘But bammans are into speaking lies, zhoot is their dharma, no? It means the SG was lying, which means Lord R was born in India!’

    Now I know why GOI withdrew the affidavit questioning existence of Ram. It was because SG was lying.

  • rana asif

    But bammans are into speaking lies, zhoot is their dharma, no? It means the SG was lying, which means Lord R was born in India

    bhardwaj has to submit proof in sc if he says rama existed.they speak lie to innocents.rama was born in treta yug hindus came 3000 years ago.destryed indusvalley civilization.
    whenthey came many races were living in india.so it is lie to say that muslims are convert from hindus.

    original name of ayodhya is saket described in their books by chinese travellers as budhdhist settlement.around 2000 years ago.brhmns captured it
    after defeat of budhdhists.changed budha temples into shv temples.
    tulsidas wrote ramcharis manas by hiding in mosque.now zoinists want a field ready for war between shvbhakts and rambhakts.this is also called die electric materiallism.

  • rana asif

    Now I know why GOI withdrew the affidavit questioning existence of Ram. It was because SG was lying

    no because of pressure from high caste hindus.

    200 muslims were taken from hashimpura village meerut and shot to death thrown in river by pac and police.no police officer was suspended or arrested or punished.it took 28 years to reach judgEment.on babri mosque demolition after 20 years notices are issued to mmjoshi and advani.this is only small part of blood crdling history of hindu india.

    hate is duty and lie a staple food.

  • Mohan
  • tajender
  • Mohan

    Kolkata madrasa head attacked for ‘trying to be a Rushdie’ http://t.co/FSF5Lgfz4w

  • tajender
  • Paul

    tajender says bammans are into lying

    bammans are into lying much less than Muslims are. Muslim are also into killing people for their joy. Bammans have led reforming their communities. Muslims are cannot reform. Killing and living in stone age is their habit. Bammans are achievers today. Muslims are laggards, killers, and haters of everyone from Yemen to China.

  • tajender
  • Mohan

    Expat freed in appreciation of Pakistan’s stance
    Saudi businessman pays SR225,000 in blood money

    Manama: A Saudi businessman has pledged to help a Pakistani national out of prison in appreciation of Pakistan’s decision to give military support to a coalition of Arab countries fighting to restore legitimacy in Yemen.

    Hosam Al Saleh said that he would pay the SR 225,000 blood money required from Mohammad Qadir Lateef who had been held largely responsible for a dramatic accident on Al Qaseem – Hael highway in which one man was killed.

    “I understand that the Pakistani expatriate is going through a very difficult situation,” the businessman was quoted as saying by local news site Sabq. “Therefore, I will pay the due money for the love of God, and also in appreciation of the stances of the Pakistani people and government and their participation in the military operation to defend the people of Yemen,” he said.


  • tajender

    mohan,..neutrality is not an option for pakistan in this conflict.saudi saved life of nawaz shareef.
    sharia laws are far better than jewish european laws.in hashimpura hindu fanatics mascared 200 muslims.for 28 years they were fighting in court.many of the dependent of victims must have died of hunger.blood money to dependent of victim is far humane and better than hanging somebody after decades of hearing and pauperising the dependents of both families.

  • Mohan

    How social media is giving mainstream media a run for its money


  • tajender
  • tajender

    mohan ranger,

    International Cricket Council (ICC) President Mustafa Kamal announced his resignation Wednesday, accusing colleagues within the game’s global body of acting “unlawfully”.

    “The main reason for my resignation is that I can’t work with those who can act unconstitutionally and unlawfully,” he told reporters in Dhaka.

    Bangladesh’s outspoken Kamal had earlier threatened to expose ‘mischievous things’ within cricket’s front office after being denied of the right to present the trophy to the winners after Sunday’s World Cup final between Australia and New Zealand.

    “I was supposed to give the trophy today. It is my constitutional right. But very unfortunately, I wasn’t allowed to do so. My rights were dishonoured. After I go back home, I will let the whole world know what’s happening in ICC. I will let the whole world know about those guys who are doing these mischievous things,” ESPNCricinfo reported Kamal as saying.

    The departing ICC president first courted controversy when he alleged that the Bangladesh-India World Cup quarter-final was “pre-arranged” in India’s favour.

    The cricket world was shocked as Kamal claimed decisions made by officials during Bangladesh’s 109-run loss to India in their World Cup quarter-final in Melbourne on Thursday seemed to have been following a script.

    Kamal was angry that India’s Rohit Sharma, who top-scored with 137, had not been given not out on 90 when he was caught at deep mid-wicket off the bowling of Rubel Hossain, only for umpires Aleem Dar and Ian Gould to signal a no-ball for what appeared to be a legitimate waist-high delivery.

    ICC chief executive Dave Richardson defended Dar and Gould from all accusations of biased officiating.

    “The ICC has noted Mr Mustafa Kamal’s comments, which are very unfortunate but made in his personal capacity. As an ICC President, he should have been more considerate in his criticism of ICC match officials, whose integrity cannot be questioned,” said Richardson.

    The ICC is yet to respond to the latest development and it remains to be seen whether Pakistan Cricket Board’s governing board member and former chairman, Najam Sethi, who was set to take up the post of ICC president in June 2015, will be expedited into the role with Kamal’s departure.

    Patron of the PCB, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif had endorsed the decision of the chairman Shaharyar Khan and Board of Governors (BoG) to recommend Sethi as Pakistan’s nominee for the post of the president of ICC for a one-year term in October last year.

    It is the second time that Pakistan got this post with Ehsan Mani representing the country as ICC president in early 2000. However, when Mani was president of the ICC the post was not a ceremonial one which it has become now in wake of the formation of the Big-Three whereby India, Australia and England enjoy veto power.

  • bajpai

  • tajender

    paul during dogra rule in kashmir,

    killing cow carry death punishment,
    killing kashmiri ,punishment was 16 ruppees,rs 14 was processing fee rs 2 was given to victim.

  • tajender

    majumdar,.. west bengal bans pravin togadias entry in the state . There are days you got to laud mamtadi

  • Mohan

    Bangladeshi blogger killers caught by two hijras, as other mard-e-mumin bystanders hesitated to give chase


  • kaalabhartibhai

    Something seriously wrong with the regular commentators here. Pakistan sending soldiers to possible dath in service of a saudi monarchy that bootlicks the West is terribly serious. Yet, many here are talking about all sorts of issues in India!

    (a) Saudi King and the gulf sheikhs are western puppets , similar to the maharajahs and nawabs in India serving the Brits as puppets before 1947. Soon after WW1 ended in 1918, the Brits played double and triple games to divide the ided by US to Saudis.arabian peninsula and selected Ibn Saud as the most subservient chieftain to be enabled to ride to power through a sea of blood with British weapons. Ibn Saud’s rival ,Rashidis of the Hejaz refused to become a protectorate of the British and then the Brits armed Ibn Saud’s wahabi faction who also launched in 1927, a bloodbath in Medina to grab power.

    (b) Please read Indian ex-diplomat, M K Bhadrakumar’s article on “it is not a sole saudi affair”. US NSC has now revealed that satellite intelligence for bombing targets in Yemen is provided by US to Saudis

    (c) West has been achieving its goals through war and atrocity. Yes, the US ambassador to Libya was killed , but that is just collateral damage for the neocon hegemonists. Oil in Libya is now controlled by British/French/Italian companies and that is what they wanted. Likewise, Western Companies have the edge in controlling oil in Iraq.

    (d) Paki people must prevent Nawaz Sharif from shedding Paki and Arab blood for enabling US plunder of Arab oil.

  • silkroute

    USA is owned and controlled by capitalist fascists-racists and christian fascists-racists since 200 years. They have played a major role in strengthening islamic fascism. But fascism-totalitarianism as such is inherent in islam since 1400 years. It was not created by US fascists. The US fascists opportunistically srengthened it and used it for their own evil purposes under the garb of some obscene western freedoms etc.

    China is also a fascist country. But it cannot still play big in this game. So it is waiting its time.

    Muslim unity is possible only when the muslims follow the goal of exterminating non-muslims. When that goal is achieved regionally then the muslims start killing each other in that particular region. This is spreading all over the world incessantly.